| Gene John, Running Back | IND |
Current/Potential | RUSH Y | YPC | LNG | REC Y | TD |
64/69 | | | | | | Indiana Hoosiers |
|
Attributes |
Morale: | Unsure |
Height: | 5-11 |
Weight: | 199 |
Ideal Wt: | 200 |
Jersey: | 43 |
Age: | 23 |
Year: | (Sr) |
Status: | OK |
Energy: | 0 |
HS Ranking: | #702 |
Pos Ranking: | #51 RB |
|
Position Ratings |
Running: | 81 |
Hands: | 43 |
Route Running: | 62 |
Run Block: | 58 |
Punt Return: | 10 |
Kick Return: | 58 |
Durability: | 21 |
Endurance: | 48 |
Adaptability: | 82 |
|
Athletic Ratings |
Arm Strength: | 73 |
Acceleration: | 52 |
Agility: | 58 |
Speed: | 67 |
Strength: | 27 |
Jumping: | 66 |
Instincts: | 51 |
Aggressiveness: | 49 |
Discipline: | 93 |
Intelligence: | 68 |
Work Ethic: | 75 |
|
Personal Bests |
Rushes: | 6 |
| |
Rushing yards: | 62 |
| |
Longest run: | 31 |
| |
Receiving yards: | 17 |
| |
Touchdowns: | 1 |
| |
|
Game Logs |
Week | Opp | Res | Rush | Yds | YPC | YPG | Lng | TD | CR | MH | FLost | Rec | Yds | YPC | TD |
|
Rushing Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Rush | Yds | YPG | YPC | Lng | TD | CR | MH | Fum | FLost | | | |
2035 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 20 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
2036 | 13 | 0 | 45 | 220 | 16.9 | 4.9 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
2037 | 11 | 0 | 31 | 139 | 12.6 | 4.5 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
Total | 27 | 0 | 83 | 379 | 14.0 | 4.6 | 31 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Receiving Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Att | Rec | Yds | YPG | YPC | YAC | Lng | TD | GC | Drp | Drp% | IR | |
2036 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 27 | 2.1 | 9.0 | 21 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 28.6 | 1 | - |
2037 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 31 | 2.8 | 10.3 | 18 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - |
Total | 27 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 58 | 2.1 | 9.7 | 39 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 20.0 | 1 | - |
|
Scouting Report | Potential |
| There is no reason why he can't be a good receiver in the future. Once he harnesses his skills, his speed will make him an exciting player. With a little more muscle, he'll break tackles on a regular basis. His running instincts probably won't turn out to be much better than average. |
|
|