 | Antonio Williams, Cornerback | CMU |
| Current/Potential | TAK | SACK | PD | INT | TD |
| 56/64 | | | | | | Central Michigan Chippewas |
|
| Attributes |
| Morale: | Unsure |
| Height: | 5-9 |
| Weight: | 190 |
| Ideal Wt: | 191 |
| Jersey: | 24 |
| Age: | 24 |
| Year: | (Sr) |
| Status: | OK |
| Energy: | 0 |
| HS Ranking: | #629 |
| Pos Ranking: | #54 CB |
|
| Position Ratings |
| Hands: | 56 |
| Tackling: | 57 |
| Coverage: | 61 |
| Punt Return: | 25 |
| Kick Return: | 25 |
| Durability: | 80 |
| Endurance: | 60 |
| Adaptability: | 69 |
|
| Athletic Ratings |
| Arm Strength: | 3 |
| Acceleration: | 42 |
| Agility: | 67 |
| Speed: | 59 |
| Strength: | 26 |
| Jumping: | 51 |
| Instincts: | 47 |
| Aggressiveness: | 48 |
| Discipline: | 33 |
| Intelligence: | 45 |
| Work Ethic: | 91 |
|
| Personal Bests |
| Tackles: | 4 |
| |
| Sacks: | 0 |
| |
| Passes defensed: | 2 |
| |
| Interceptions: | 1 |
| |
| TD: | 0 |
| |
|
| Game Logs |
| Week | Opp | Res | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | FF | PD | Int | Yds | Ave | TD | MT | OOP | BPA |
|
| Defensive Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | MT | OOP | BPA | |
| 2035 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | - |
| 2036 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2037 | 11 | 8 | 35 | 23 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 2 | - |
| Total | 17 | 8 | 43 | 28 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 2 | - |
|
| Turnover Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | Ints | Yds | Avg | RecF | Yds | Avg | TD | | | | | | |
| 2037 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 17 | 8 | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| Scouting Report | Potential |
| Coaches are confident that they can help this kid become a solid man defender. Most scouts project that he will eventually have very good speed for a corner. He shows signs of becoming one of the most agile corners in the land as his career progresses. When fully developed, I look for him to be very reliable in zone coverage. |
|
|
|