| Samuel Brown, Quarterback | BAY |
Current/Potential | RATING | YARDS | COMP% | TD | INT |
58/67 | | | | | | Baylor Bears |
|
Attributes |
Morale: | Unsure |
Height: | 6-2 |
Weight: | 184 |
Ideal Wt: | 185 |
Jersey: | 10 |
Age: | 23 |
Year: | (Sr) |
Status: | OK |
Energy: | 0 |
HS Ranking: | #653 |
Pos Ranking: | #28 QB |
|
Position Ratings |
Passing Accuracy: | 52 |
Passing Touch: | 62 |
Running: | 59 |
Hands: | 33 |
Punt Return: | 11 |
Kick Return: | 5 |
Durability: | 30 |
Endurance: | 39 |
Adaptability: | 98 |
|
Athletic Ratings |
Arm Strength: | 50 |
Acceleration: | 36 |
Agility: | 60 |
Speed: | 55 |
Strength: | 47 |
Jumping: | 53 |
Instincts: | 56 |
Aggressiveness: | 49 |
Discipline: | 45 |
Intelligence: | 71 |
Work Ethic: | 67 |
|
Personal Bests |
Attempts: | 15 |
| |
Completions: | 10 |
| |
Passing yards: | 95 |
| |
Longest pass: | 16 |
| |
Touchdowns: | 1 |
| |
|
Game Logs |
Week | Opp | Res | Att | Comp | Comp% | Yds | Yds/A | TD | Int | Lng | Sack | Rat | R Yds | YPC | R TDs |
|
Passing Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Comp-Att | Comp% | Yds | Yds/A | TD | TD% | Int | Int% | Lng | GP | BP | Sack | Rat |
2036 | 3 | 0 | 9-16 | 56.2 | 55 | 3.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 6.2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 72.6 |
2037 | 4 | 0 | 15-28 | 53.6 | 135 | 4.8 | 1 | 3.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 105.9 |
Total | 7 | 0 | 24-44 | 54.5 | 190 | 4.3 | 1 | 2.3 | 1 | 2.3 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 93.8 |
|
Rushing Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Rush | Yds | YPG | YPC | Lng | TD | CR | MH | Fum | FLost | Sack | YL | |
2036 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 11.3 | 8.5 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | - |
2037 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 13 | - |
Total | 7 | 0 | 5 | 39 | 5.6 | 7.8 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 23 | - |
|
Scouting Report | Potential |
| Average accuracy as a passer. That part of his game won't ever be anything special. Has the basic foundation to become a decent touch passer in the future. Arm strength will probably never be the best, but it should be more the adequate. His scrambling ability will continue to evolve, which is very bad news for the defenses. |
|
|