| Robert Riggs, Running Back | EMU |
Current/Potential | RUSH Y | YPC | LNG | REC Y | TD |
39/39 | | | | | | Eastern Michigan Eagles |
|
Attributes |
Morale: | Unsure |
Height: | 5-11 |
Weight: | 192 |
Ideal Wt: | 193 |
Jersey: | 37 |
Age: | 24 |
Year: | (Sr) |
Status: | OK |
Energy: | 0 |
HS Ranking: | NA |
Pos Ranking: | NA |
|
Position Ratings |
Running: | 36 |
Hands: | 46 |
Route Running: | 34 |
Run Block: | 33 |
Punt Return: | 3 |
Kick Return: | 34 |
Durability: | 50 |
Endurance: | 71 |
Adaptability: | 72 |
|
Athletic Ratings |
Arm Strength: | 9 |
Acceleration: | 35 |
Agility: | 39 |
Speed: | 38 |
Strength: | 18 |
Jumping: | 63 |
Instincts: | 48 |
Aggressiveness: | 55 |
Discipline: | 93 |
Intelligence: | 64 |
Work Ethic: | 94 |
|
Personal Bests |
Rushes: | 0 |
| |
Rushing yards: | 0 |
| |
Longest run: | 0 |
| |
Receiving yards: | 0 |
| |
Touchdowns: | 0 |
| |
|
Game Logs |
Week | Opp | Res | Rush | Yds | YPC | YPG | Lng | TD | CR | MH | FLost | Rec | Yds | YPC | TD |
|
Defensive Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | MT | OOP | BPA | |
2037 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Total | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
|
Turnover Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Ints | Yds | Avg | RecF | Yds | Avg | TD | | | | | | |
2037 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Returning Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | KRet | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | PRet | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | FC | | |
2036 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 35.0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - |
Total | 2 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 35.0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - |
|
Scouting Report | Potential |
| Could become a decent receiver with a little more work. Breakaway speed will never top his list of assets, but it won't be terrible either. He'll eventually be able to break some tackles but a solid hit will bring him down. His running instincts probably won't turn out to be much better than average. |
|
|