 | William Harper, Defensive End | RUT |
| Current/Potential | SACK | STUFF | TAK | HUR | DP |
| 53/59 | | | | | | Rutgers Scarlet Knights |
|
| Attributes |
| Morale: | Unsure |
| Height: | 6-5 |
| Weight: | 257 |
| Ideal Wt: | 260 |
| Jersey: | 93 |
| Age: | 22 |
| Year: | (Jr) |
| Status: | OK |
| Energy: | 0 |
| HS Ranking: | #1753 |
| Pos Ranking: | #110 DE |
|
| Position Ratings |
| Pass Rush Moves: | 47 |
| Point of Attack: | 58 |
| Hands: | 31 |
| Tackling: | 52 |
| Coverage: | 35 |
| Durability: | 44 |
| Endurance: | 46 |
| Adaptability: | 75 |
|
| Athletic Ratings |
| Arm Strength: | 6 |
| Acceleration: | 50 |
| Agility: | 46 |
| Speed: | 30 |
| Strength: | 40 |
| Jumping: | 28 |
| Instincts: | 47 |
| Aggressiveness: | 81 |
| Discipline: | 84 |
| Intelligence: | 47 |
| Work Ethic: | 59 |
|
| Personal Bests |
| Sacks: | 0 |
| |
| Stuffs: | 0 |
| |
| Tackles: | 2 |
| |
| Hurries: | 1 |
| |
| Interceptions: | 1 |
| |
|
| Game Logs |
| Week | Opp | Res | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | Int | TD | MT | OOP |
|
| Defensive Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | MT | OOP | BPA | |
| 2036 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2037 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | - |
| Total | 9 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | - |
|
| Turnover Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | Ints | Yds | Avg | RecF | Yds | Avg | TD | | | | | | |
| 2036 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2037 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 9 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| Scouting Report | Potential |
| He'll develop decent pass rush skills but won't be anything special in this area. Has the combination of power and speed to someday be a reliable end against the run. I expect his tackling ability to rise to at least a satisfactory level. His agility will never make you stand up and take notice, but it should be good enough. |
|
|
|