| Theodore Rucker, Wide Receiver | CAL |
Current/Potential | REC | REC Y | YPC | LNG | TD |
58/67 | | | | | | California Golden Bears |
|
Attributes |
Morale: | Unsure |
Height: | 6-3 |
Weight: | 172 |
Ideal Wt: | 175 |
Jersey: | 86 |
Age: | 23 |
Year: | (Jr) |
Status: | OK |
Energy: | 0 |
HS Ranking: | #363 |
Pos Ranking: | #50 WR |
|
Position Ratings |
Hands: | 58 |
Route Running: | 55 |
Running: | 53 |
Run Block: | 7 |
Punt Return: | 68 |
Kick Return: | 73 |
Durability: | 83 |
Endurance: | 42 |
Adaptability: | 83 |
|
Athletic Ratings |
Arm Strength: | 58 |
Acceleration: | 64 |
Agility: | 74 |
Speed: | 62 |
Strength: | 40 |
Jumping: | 55 |
Instincts: | 39 |
Aggressiveness: | 46 |
Discipline: | 37 |
Intelligence: | 80 |
Work Ethic: | 51 |
|
Personal Bests |
Receptions: | 7 |
| |
Receiving yards: | 80 |
| |
Longest catch: | 43 |
| |
Rushing Yards: | 0 |
| |
Touchdowns: | 2 |
| |
|
Game Logs |
Week | Opp | Res | Att | Rec | Yds | YPC | YAC | Lng | TD | GC | Drp | FLost | R Yds | YPC | TD |
|
Receiving Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Att | Rec | Yds | YPG | YPC | YAC | Lng | TD | GC | Drp | Drp% | IR | |
2036 | 6 | 1 | 24 | 9 | 114 | 19.0 | 12.7 | 23 | 43 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | - |
2037 | 8 | 1 | 34 | 18 | 191 | 23.9 | 10.6 | 42 | 27 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | - |
Total | 14 | 2 | 58 | 27 | 305 | 21.8 | 11.3 | 65 | 43 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | - |
|
Returning Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | KRet | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | PRet | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | FC | | |
2036 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - |
2037 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 153 | 15.3 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - |
Total | 14 | 2 | 11 | 171 | 15.5 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - |
|
Scouting Report | Potential |
| When he reaches the top of his game, he won't drop many passes. When it comes to running routes, he'll probably become respectable but I wouldn't expect much more than that. He'll have some speed; just needs to learn how to use it on the football field. I think he'll get the hang of run blocking but won't ever be much better than average. |
|
|