 | Dennis Williams, Cornerback | CAL |
| Current/Potential | TAK | SACK | PD | INT | TD |
| 57/68 | | | | | | California Golden Bears |
|
| Attributes |
| Morale: | Unsure |
| Height: | 6-1 |
| Weight: | 168 |
| Ideal Wt: | 169 |
| Jersey: | 40 |
| Age: | 23 |
| Year: | (Jr) |
| Status: | OK |
| Energy: | 0 |
| HS Ranking: | #511 |
| Pos Ranking: | #41 CB |
|
| Position Ratings |
| Hands: | 58 |
| Tackling: | 67 |
| Coverage: | 70 |
| Punt Return: | 60 |
| Kick Return: | 53 |
| Durability: | 71 |
| Endurance: | 64 |
| Adaptability: | 61 |
|
| Athletic Ratings |
| Arm Strength: | 8 |
| Acceleration: | 45 |
| Agility: | 62 |
| Speed: | 55 |
| Strength: | 27 |
| Jumping: | 36 |
| Instincts: | 39 |
| Aggressiveness: | 38 |
| Discipline: | 48 |
| Intelligence: | 63 |
| Work Ethic: | 83 |
|
| Personal Bests |
| Tackles: | 8 |
| |
| Sacks: | 0 |
| |
| Passes defensed: | 2 |
| |
| Interceptions: | 1 |
| |
| TD: | 0 |
| |
|
| Game Logs |
| Week | Opp | Res | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | FF | PD | Int | Yds | Ave | TD | MT | OOP | BPA |
|
| Defensive Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | MT | OOP | BPA | |
| 2035 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 6 | - |
| 2037 | 9 | 7 | 24 | 15 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 2 | - |
| Total | 14 | 11 | 36 | 21 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 | 4 | 8 | - |
|
| Turnover Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | Ints | Yds | Avg | RecF | Yds | Avg | TD | | | | | | |
| 2035 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2037 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 23 | 23.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 14 | 11 | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| Scouting Report | Potential |
| Most people feel that he will be a pretty good blitzing corner in the future. Coaches are confident that they can help this kid become a solid man defender. He'll never be thought of as a hardbody, but he should acquire enough muscle to play corner. Coaches will continue to work on his tackling until it's at least adequate. |
|
|
|