 | Richard Lee, Tight End | UCON |
| Current/Potential | REC | REC Y | YPC | LNG | TD |
| 60/73 | | | | | | Connecticut Huskies |
|
| Attributes |
| Morale: | Unsure |
| Height: | 6-6 |
| Weight: | 241 |
| Ideal Wt: | 245 |
| Jersey: | 89 |
| Age: | 21 |
| Year: | Jr |
| Status: | OK |
| Energy: | 0 |
| HS Ranking: | #508 |
| Pos Ranking: | #14 TE |
|
| Position Ratings |
| Hands: | 78 |
| Route Running: | 63 |
| Pass Block: | 67 |
| Run Block: | 50 |
| Punt Return: | 9 |
| Kick Return: | 3 |
| Long Snapping: | 92 |
| Durability: | 68 |
| Endurance: | 64 |
| Adaptability: | 68 |
|
| Athletic Ratings |
| Arm Strength: | 1 |
| Acceleration: | 54 |
| Agility: | 47 |
| Speed: | 43 |
| Strength: | 53 |
| Jumping: | 31 |
| Instincts: | 62 |
| Aggressiveness: | 54 |
| Discipline: | 33 |
| Intelligence: | 80 |
| Work Ethic: | 50 |
|
| Personal Bests |
| Receptions: | 3 |
| |
| Receiving yards: | 57 |
| |
| Longest catch: | 44 |
| |
| Run blocks: | 0 |
| |
| Touchdowns: | 1 |
| |
|
| Game Logs |
| Week | Opp | Res | Att | Rec | Yds | YPC | YAC | Lng | TD | GC | Drp | FLost | KRB | Pan | Hold |
|
| Receiving Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | Att | Rec | Yds | YPG | YPC | YAC | Lng | TD | GC | Drp | Drp% | IR | |
| 2036 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 46 | 23.0 | 23.0 | 13 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 2037 | 9 | 9 | 23 | 12 | 198 | 22.0 | 16.5 | 43 | 44 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.3 | 3 | - |
| Total | 11 | 11 | 27 | 14 | 244 | 22.2 | 17.4 | 56 | 44 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.7 | 3 | - |
|
| Blocking Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | KRB | Pan | SA | Hold | FS | MB | | | | | | | |
| 2036 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 11 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| Scouting Report | Potential |
| Has the natural tools needed to become an awesome receiver with just a little more work. With continued commitment, he will eventually run reliable routes. As his college career progresses, his coaches are going to be happy with his speed. This kid should become an effective run blocker with a little more time and effort. |
|
|
|